|
WHY? WHY? WHY?
Nelson King
It has become the established usage and
custom of York Council No.133 of the
Allied Masonic Degrees of America, at
the installation of the Sovereign
Master, to have the Sovereign Master
deliver a paper to the Council. The
paper that I am going to deliver to you
may in some cases may shock you, some of
you will agree with me, some of you will
not, some of you may even get angry. But
I would hope that you will receive this
paper with an open mind.
North American Freemasonry is on a
decline, in fact it is in a downward
death spiral the likes of which have
never before been seen. Why? Why is
membership declining so rapidly? Why are
new Masons so hard to keep interested in
Masonry? Why? Why? Why?
I am of the firm belief that North
American Grand Lodges, have for years
not been making Masons, but rather
gathering members. Listen to any Past
Master and you will hear him say."In my
year I Initiated X number of
candidates." The number of members of a
Lodge or a Grand Lodge has become the
mark by which success has been measured.
We have for to long been playing a
numbers game. The mentality has been
those with the greatest number win.
We have forgotten the primary reasons
for the existence of Freemasonry -
BROTHERHOOD - FRIENDSHIP - CLOSENESS. We
idolizing bigness. A Masonic Lodge
should be small to promote the purpose
for the existence of the Fraternity. For
example today we have Lodges that still
have 200 - 300 members, but if 20 - 30
come out for a regular meeting we
consider this a successful meeting. Why?
Is it not because we have made members,
not Masons? Would it not be better to
have a small lodge where everyone knows
each other? Lodges were Brotherly Love,
is the first order of business. Small
Lodges work, ask any member of UGLE,
where once a Lodge has 50 Masons it must
think about starting another Lodge, and
must split when the number of Masons
reach 75. And yes the Lodges in the
provinces are growing, faster than the
urban Lodges, again because in the
smaller communities everyone knows
everyone and true Masonry can be
practiced.
However, today Grand Lodges are still
playing the numbers game. Decline of
membership is so great that some Grand
Lodges are panicking Some are holding
Grand Master Classes. Classes in which
anywhere from 100 - 800 plus members are
given the 3 degrees in one day. Classes
in which if held on a weekend the new
members of the Craft, can be held over
to be give all the AASR Degrees in one
more day, and then onward to the Shrine.
They in my opinion are making members,
NOT MASONS.
We have had these one day Masons try to
visit Lodges in Ontario, but they have
been unable to pass a simple Board of
Trial. They have a dues card but no
knowledge of Craft, they have been
refused entry into our Lodges, because
they cannot answer the simplest of
questions from the Board of Trial.
The philosophy has been and still is
members, members and even more members.
Number of new members equals success. We
have lost our Masonic direction. Because
of this we have lost what it means to be
a Mason. This phenomena of numbers has
produce Lodge Officers, Masters, and
Grand Lodge Officers, who have no or
little idea of what it means to be a
Freemason. We pass candidates from one
degree to the next, from one chair to
the next chair, who have not learned
what it means to be a Mason. Oh sure
some of them can do ritual, but ritual
does not a Mason make. We elect Masters,
not on merit, but due to the fact that
he progressed from one chair to the
next, and maybe he is a good ritualist,
but is he knowledgeable, is he a good
Mason, is he a leader, does he have
merit? In a majority of cases the answer
is no. Is it any wonder so many Lodges
are in trouble? Is it no wonder
attendance is poor?
We elect Grand Lodge Officers not
because of merit, but because of the old
boys' system. Politics are a banned
discussions in Lodges, but we play
politics when we elect our Grand Lodge
Officers. How often have we all seen
DDGM's who do not have clue as how to
run Lodge, or a District? DDGM's who
have little or no concept of what
Freemasonry is all about, DDGM's some of
who don't even know when to sit or stand
during the opening and closing of a
Lodge. DDGM's who are elected because it
was his Lodges turn, or because he had
the "right" people backing him. Is this
leadership?
Let me share with you a comment made by
a well-respected Mason in another
Jurisdiction.
" . . . the problem is that all too many
senior Grand Lodge officers today seem
to have managed to escape from learning
by the experiences of the Mastership of
the Lodge. They believe that a few terms
in ceremonial teams and some pleasantly
comfortable years at the center of power
is what it is all about. These are the
people who presume to rule over the
remainder of the Craft. To impose their
views and opinions in a most unmasonic
way."
He goes on to say.
"Many senior Grand Lodge officers seem
to have no other motive than the
collection of Gold braid and Royal Blue
cloth. To see them strutting about and
reveling in their own self importance
can be an utterly sickening sight. But
even worse is to realize that many of
these men who are supposedly shining
examples of virtue and knowledge are
nothing more than two legged egos
looking for their next fix at the altar
of their exclusive little mutual
admiration society. Their knowledge and
understanding of Freemasonry is
woefully, even criminally poor. To think
that these are the guardians of such a
sacred trust as the mysteries of the
Craft is, to say the least,
disconcerting."
My Brethren is it not time for us to
revert to the Ancient Charges of a
Freemason? These charges which can be
found in our Book of Constitution, and
ought be read in open Lodge at least
once a year.
One of the Charges state:
"All preferment among Masons is grounded
upon real worth and personal merit only,
so that the lodges may be well served,
the brethren not put to shame, nor the
royal Craft despised; therefore no
Master or Warden is chosen by seniority,
but for his merit."
Is it not time that we reverted to being
Freemasons and once again following the
Ancient Charges? Why are we always
trying to reinvent Masonry? There is
nothing wrong with Freemasonry.
Do I have an answer? No. But I have the
privilege because of my job, of knowing
what other Grand Lodges are doing. For
example one Grand Lodge, the fee for
joining is in excess of $1800.00 US. The
annual dues run from $500.00 to $1000.00
US. You can expect to wait 1 to 3 years
after making application before you are
initiated. You must attach a written
police report to your application. You
will be interviewed by the Lodge in the
Lodge room, 2 to 5 times before your
application is even voted on. After
initiation you will spend anywhere from
18 months to 36 months before you are
passed to the second degree. You will
write papers on what it means to you to
be a Mason, and deliver these papers in
open Lodge. You must understand what it
means to be a Mason. You will then be
voted on before receiving the next
degree. The same procedure is carried on
for the third degree. You will spend
anywhere from 2 to 5 years before you
are a Master Mason. Very rarely do
members miss meetings. If they do, they
phone the secretary to advise him why
they are missing. They have long waiting
lists of men who want to become a Mason.
This Grand Lodge doubles in size every 9
years, many of the Lodges are young. The
average size of a lodge is 45 members,
and the largest has 120 they normally
split in two, creating a new lodge when
they reach 60 Masons. From the average
of 45 members, about 30 to 35 attend
every time. They have an average of 5
candidates per year. The candidates are
generally between ages 25 and 40. They
say the two major reasons for their
success is keeping the lodges' small, so
they know each other well, and the
papers and lectures they have at each
meeting. Yes to them it means something
to be a Mason. It is a way of life.
This a far cry from a Lodge that has 500
members and only 12 show up for regular
meetings.
I realize that I have more questions
than answers, but our Gentle Craft in
North America is dying. I have only one
more question. What are you going to do
about it?
|